Publications

Review papers (peer-reviewed)
1. Stewart, E.E.M., Valsecchi, M., & Schütz, A.C. (2020). A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision. Journal of Vision, 20(12), 2. PDF

Preprints
2. Goettker, A., & Stewart, E.E.M. (2024). Spatial and directional tuning of serial dependence for tracking eye movements. bioRxiv (link). PDF

1. Stewart, E.E.M., Fleming, R.W., & Schütz, A.C. (2023). A simple optical flow model explains why certain object viewpoints are special. bioRxiv (link).  PDF

Journal Articles (peer-reviewed)
14.  Stewart, E.E.M., Fleming, R.W., & Schütz, A.C. (in press). A simple optical flow model explains why certain object viewpoints are special. Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

13. Stewart, E.E.M., & Fleming, R.W. (2023). The eyes anticipate where objects will move based on their shape. Current Biology. 33(17), R894-R895. PDF

12. Stewart, E. E. M., Hartmann, F. T., Morgenstern, Y., Storrs, K. R., Maiello, G., & Fleming, R. W. (2022). Mental object rotation based on two-dimensional visual representations. Current Biology, 32(21), R1224–R1225. PDF

11. Goettker, A., & Stewart, E.E.M. (2022). Serial dependence for oculomotor control depends on early sensory signals, Current Biology. 32(13), 2956-2961. PDF

10. Short, C. E., Crutzen, R., Stewart, E. E. M., O’Rielly, J., Dry, M., Skuse, A., … & Vincent, A. (2022). Exploring the Interplay Between Message Format, Need for Cognition and Personal Relevance on Processing Messages About Physical Activity: a Two-Arm Randomized Experimental Trial. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1-14. PDF

9. Stewart, E.E.M., Ludwig, C.J.H., & Schütz, A.C. (2022). Humans represent the precision and utility of information acquired across fixations. Scientific Reports. 12, 2411. PDF

8. Stewart, E.E.M., Hübner, C., & Schütz, A.C. (2020). Stronger saccadic suppression of displacement and blanking effect in children. Journal of Vision, 20(10), 13. PDF

7. Stewart, E.E.M., & Schütz, A.C. (2019). Transsaccadic integration benefits are not limited to the saccade target. Journal of neurophysiology, 122 (4), 1491-1501. PDF

6. Stewart, E.E.M., Verghese, P., & Ma-Wyatt, A. (2019). The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches. Journal of Vision, 19(9):12. PDF

5. Stewart, E.E.M., & Schütz, A.C. (2019). Trans-saccadic integration is dominated by early, independent noise. Journal of Vision, 19(6):17. PDF

4. Stewart, E.E.M., & Schütz, A.C. (2018). Optimal trans-saccadic integration relies on visual working memory. Vision research, 153, 70-81. PDF

3. Stewart, E.E.M., & Schütz, A.C. (2018). Attention modulates trans-saccadic integration. Vision research, 142, 1-10. PDF

2. Stewart, E.E.M., & Ma-Wyatt, A. (2017). The profile of attention differs between locations orthogonal to and in line with reach direction. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(8), 2412-2423. PDF

1. Stewart, E.E.M., & Ma-Wyatt, A. (2015). The spatiotemporal characteristics of the attentional shift relative to a reach. Journal of Vision 15(5):10. PDF